Paint Ugly Self With a Beautiful Color // vanillycake: nationalpost: Breastfeeding mom...

vanillycake:

nationalpost:

Breastfeeding mom takes on Facebook nudity policyFacebook and breastfeeding activists are engaged in a battle over the posting of photographs that show mothers feeding their babies.The latest incident happened Saturday, when she was sent a written warning that a photo of her and her two-year-old daughter Chloe, who was breastfeeding at the time, was considered “sexually explicit.” Facebook has a strict nudity policy.Later that day, a two-year-old photo of her feeding her now four-year-old daughter, Sophie, was also deleted. Kwasnica was then banned from the site for three days.“Facebook should just leave breastfeeding photos alone,” Kwasnica said. “(Breastfeeding is) not pornographic. It’s not obscene. It’s a normal human function.” (Photo: Bryanna Bradley/Montreal Gazette)

So basically this is saying breastfeeding photos are okay, meaning the exposed breast is okay.ALRIGHT LADIES. LET’S JUST FUCK WEARING SHIRTS AND BRAS FROM NOW ON. IT’S NOT EXPLICIT RIGHT? NAH TITS ARE JUST A PART OF THE BEAUTIFUL HUMAN BODY. It’s not like it’s obscene or anything letting everyone including children see women’s exposed tits! Hell, it’s even hard enough for me to look at man tits! But that’s okay, let’s just add dripping milk from the nipples into the mix! Hey you know what else is a beautiful part of the human body? DICKS. Let’s start having the men post pictures of their dicks! It’s not obscene it’s just a part of the human body! Hell, we should start taking pictures of ourselves having sex! It’s completely normal and everyone does it in order procreate! Then afterwards we should take videos of us giving birth and show everyone we know because hey, that’s also part of being human!
Some women man. Just…FUCK these types of women. I don’t want to see it, your friends don’t want to see it. The naked body is the most intimate form a person can see. Don’t these women call girls who flash their tits at parties sluts? because you know…she’s technically doing the same thing.
*gasp* /rageenducedrant
I should mention stupid feminists make me angry.

Why is it alright that pictures of shirtless men are okay but for women, it’s not?
Is it just because we happen to have mounds of fat on top of our chest?
Is it because people seem to have such a fascination with breasts and they are often glorified?
But breasts are involved in sex play a lot! We can’t let people see those! it’s obscene!
Why? My boyfriends plays with my chest during sex play, so what? I rub my hands up and down his chest too, but it’s alright if he’s shirtless and not me?
Breasts are a part of the beautiful human body.
No one said if breastfeeding pictures okay suddenly so are penises, pictures of coitus, etc.
But it’s a slippery slope! If pictures of breast feeding is allowed, everything else wil follow!
Why? What makes you say that? There is nothing sexual about breast feeding. You wouldn’t yell at me for putting up a picture of me giving a child a juice, or some food to eat. It’s the same concept. It just happens to involve a part of the human body. A breast’s primary function is to produce milk to offspring. It is not a sexual organ. Why is it treated as such?
I see nothing wrong with the above picture.
She’s completely clothed, you can’t see anything.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with that picture.

nationalpost:

Breastfeeding mom takes on Facebook nudity policy
Facebook and breastfeeding activists are engaged in a battle over the posting of photographs that show mothers feeding their babies.

The latest incident happened Saturday, when she was sent a written warning that a photo of her and her two-year-old daughter Chloe, who was breastfeeding at the time, was considered “sexually explicit.”

Facebook has a strict nudity policy.

Later that day, a two-year-old photo of her feeding her now four-year-old daughter, Sophie, was also deleted. Kwasnica was then banned from the site for three days.

“Facebook should just leave breastfeeding photos alone,” Kwasnica said. “(Breastfeeding is) not pornographic. It’s not obscene. It’s a normal human function.” (Photo: Bryanna Bradley/Montreal Gazette)

So basically this is saying breastfeeding photos are okay, meaning the exposed breast is okay.
ALRIGHT LADIES. LET’S JUST FUCK WEARING SHIRTS AND BRAS FROM NOW ON. IT’S NOT EXPLICIT RIGHT? NAH TITS ARE JUST A PART OF THE BEAUTIFUL HUMAN BODY. It’s not like it’s obscene or anything letting everyone including children see women’s exposed tits! Hell, it’s even hard enough for me to look at man tits! But that’s okay, let’s just add dripping milk from the nipples into the mix! Hey you know what else is a beautiful part of the human body? DICKS. Let’s start having the men post pictures of their dicks! It’s not obscene it’s just a part of the human body! Hell, we should start taking pictures of ourselves having sex! It’s completely normal and everyone does it in order procreate! Then afterwards we should take videos of us giving birth and show everyone we know because hey, that’s also part of being human!

Some women man. Just…FUCK these types of women. I don’t want to see it, your friends don’t want to see it. The naked body is the most intimate form a person can see. Don’t these women call girls who flash their tits at parties sluts? because you know…she’s technically doing the same thing.

*gasp* /rageenducedrant

I should mention stupid feminists make me angry.

Why is it alright that pictures of shirtless men are okay but for women, it’s not?

Is it just because we happen to have mounds of fat on top of our chest?

Is it because people seem to have such a fascination with breasts and they are often glorified?

But breasts are involved in sex play a lot! We can’t let people see those! it’s obscene!

Why? My boyfriends plays with my chest during sex play, so what? I rub my hands up and down his chest too, but it’s alright if he’s shirtless and not me?

Breasts are a part of the beautiful human body.

No one said if breastfeeding pictures okay suddenly so are penises, pictures of coitus, etc.

But it’s a slippery slope! If pictures of breast feeding is allowed, everything else wil follow!

Why? What makes you say that? There is nothing sexual about breast feeding. You wouldn’t yell at me for putting up a picture of me giving a child a juice, or some food to eat. It’s the same concept. It just happens to involve a part of the human body. A breast’s primary function is to produce milk to offspring. It is not a sexual organ. Why is it treated as such?

I see nothing wrong with the above picture.

She’s completely clothed, you can’t see anything.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with that picture.

POSTED 4 months ago ♥ 59 notes

Reblogged from: viraveththeselkie via posted by: nationalpost

♥ 59 notes